Why is the West fighting for Syria?


By Vestnik Kavkaza


Konstantin Sivkov, first vice-president of the Academy of Geopolitical Problems, Captain, member of the Communist Party, has recently stated his position on the Middle East developments. He presented the situation from the point of view of a military man, but his ideas correlate with the official position of the Russian authorities.

Syria is the last point in this system, in which the West has a chance of establishing its influence and a puppet regime. Moreover, Syria, if it can defend its independence, if it will not allow the establishment of Western control or the overthrow of this regime, will mean for Western civilization something like Stalingrad for Hitler's regime. That is, it would mean the final defeat of Western strategy. The West cannot admit this, so the Western countries will fight for Syria.

The so-called unapologetic opposition is currently completely discredited. We cannot say that there are clearly-defined political forces supported by at least some part of the population which is against the government.

There is a staff, which is based in Turkey, which is made up of ethnic Syrians who have long broken their relations with Syria, who have arrived from England, France and America. Such a staff exists. There are multinational terrorist organizations, from al-Qaida to small, private organizations, which form the strike force of illegal armed groups. There is a small part of the Syrian youth who join them because of personal circumstances. This force is fighting against Syria.

On the other hand, there are the regular troops and the majority of the population of Syria, which initially have not fully supported the regime of Bashar al-Assad, and there have been quite serious protest rallies; however, having become acquainted with the "fighters for independence", with the"fighters for justice and democracy", all these people have dramatically shifted to the side of Bashar Assad and the current regime, as well as the army which has demonstrated its morale.

As a result of the large-scale strategic offensive of the militants this July-August, the first offensive got bogged down on the outskirts of Damascus and Aleppo, and they were defeated; after that they rejected the plan of laying siege to cities - not only these cities, but any other cities. They switched to purely terrorist activities. Thus, the strategy of NATO, aimed at the defeat of the Syrian regime by illegal armed groups, eventually failed. Today, NATO members have to change this strategy.

There is only one solution to the problem of Syria. This is a full-scale military operation with the participation of the regular forces of NATO. The latest provocations on the part of Turkey with the capture and forced landing of two airplanes, Armenian and Syrian, the shelling of Syrian territory by Turkey in response to the mortar shells allegedly falling into Turkey, which could be released by the militants for any provocative purposes, once again confirmed this. Such an invasion can be realized from Turkish military and strategic bases. But apparently, given that the Turks suddenly for no reason acknowledged that there was nothing illegal on board the captured Syrian airplane, the Turkish government is reluctant to get involved in it. Therefore, the situation of NATO is quite complicated now.

Given the potential of the armed forces in Syria and their willingness to fight, the defeat of the Syrian army will require the creation of a sufficiently powerful group of at least 1500 carrier-based, tactical and strategic aircraft, no less than 500 thousand ground troops, naval groups and at least several million tons of supplies in order to implement the operation and establish territorial control over Syria. Now NATO has no such opportunities. Therefore I suppose that the tension in Syria will continue to grow with various provocations. I do not rule out that with there will be several provocations concerning Turkey on the part of Syria in order to provoke Turkey to begin a war against Syria. I do not rule that out. This will be done not by the Syrians but by al-Qaeda, for example. So I guess we must watch this and monitor this closely.

As for Iran, there are a number of problems. First, the issue of Iranian nuclear weapons is a bluff. NATO members themselves say Iran cannot carry out more than more than 20% uranium enrichment. To build a nuclear bomb, it must be enriched to 95%. Iran is not so close to its building. But 20% enriched uranium rods for use in nuclear power are acceptable. Therefore, talking about Iran's nuclear program – this is just an excuse, just the same as the excuse of weapons of mass destruction of Saddam Hussein, which did not exist.

Iran is a danger to the West – it is a Shiite center, which consolidates Shiite Islam with its traditional values of Islam against the West. This means limited access to the resources of the entire region. That's what is dangerous, so they are being prepared to fight against Iran. Attacking Iran by military forces is very problematic, for the same reasons as with Syria. To do this, the West needs to create a powerful force, even more powerful than against Syria. Moreover, this group must be placed somewhere. The West needs a military-strategic base, and there is no such base near Iran, because Iraq maintains a pro-Iranian position. There are no forces required. Applying single random attacks, like in Benghazi in 1982, is meaningless. Making a strike on Iran's nuclear complex, which is for the most part located in underground pits and in mountain ranges, is also impossible for the simple reason that even the most powerful American bunker-bomb cannot ensure the destruction of such facilities, not to mention the notorious cruise missiles. They have little speed; they cannot deal strikes on such facilities. That’s why a military operation against Iran is unlikely at this stage. Only demonstrative strikes with dubious consequences for those strikes, but not for Iran, are possible. I believe that economic pressure will be the first priority. The information war against Iran will continue. And I believe that there will be intense, long, hard work to create a "fifth column" in Iran in order to overthrow the Iranian government on the model of Libya, Egypt and Tunisia.

1910 views


More World news

Daesh announces withdrawal from Syria#039s Al Bab

Daesh announces withdrawal from Syria's Al Bab

The Islamic State (ISIL or Daesh, outlawed in Russia) terrorist group has started to leave the besieged northern Syrian town of Al Bab, media reports said Thursday. The Daesh has announced the start of its withdrawal …

Geneva holds new inter-Syrian round of peace talks

Geneva holds new inter-Syrian round of peace talks

Syrian government and opposition delegations started today a new round of peace talks at the UN headquarters in Geneva, Switzerland, after 10 months of the failure of the last attempt to end the conflict, Prensa Latina reports. …

Explosion hits chemical plant in Eastern Uzbekistan

Explosion hits chemical plant in Eastern Uzbekistan

An explosion hit chemical plant Farg’onaazot, a producer of nitrogen fertilizers, in the east of Uzbekistan, resulting in several victims, the country's Emergencies Ministry said in a statement. The …

Austrian Chancellor calls on EU to soften sanctions against Russia

Austrian Chancellor calls on EU to soften sanctions against Russia

Chancellor of Austria, Christian Kern, made an appeal to review the sanctions against Russia. According to him, such measures have not led to an improvement in the situation on the key contentious issues, Bloomberg reports. The EU must …

Mosul airport #039liberated#039 from Isis in battle for western half of Iraq#039s second city

Mosul airport 'liberated' from Isis in battle for western half of Iraq's second city

Iraqi forces have seized Mosul's airport and a nearby military base from Islamic State, according to state-run media. The US-backed government forces hope to use the airport as a launchpad for their campaign to expel the jihadists from …

Putin names Russian targets in Syria

Putin names Russian targets in Syria

Moscow does not attempt to intervene in the internal affairs of Syria, Russian President Vladimir Putin said, stressing the need to deliver a decisive blow to terrorism. The President noted that today it is a difficult situation in …

Tashkent and Astana to establish daily flight connection

Tashkent and Astana to establish daily flight connection

Uzbekistan and Kazakhstan plan to launch daily flights between the two capitals. It is also is expected to launch a rail connection between Almaty and Tashkent. These issues were on the agenda of the meeting of the Intergovernmental …

NATO ships show aggression towards Russian ships at Syrian coast

NATO ships show aggression towards Russian ships at Syrian coast

Today, at a meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin, the Russian sailors claimed that NATO ships were near the Russian ships, serving at the Syrian coast. Also, the sailors noted that the actions of the Alliance ships were not …

Four thousand immigrants from Russia fight on Syrian side, Putin says

Four thousand immigrants from Russia fight on Syrian side, Putin says

A huge number of fighters from Russia and former Soviet republics fight in Syria, Russian President Vladimir Putin said at a meeting with officers of the Northern Fleet. According to the President, there are thousands of Russian …

Will EU continue to support Kiev?

Will EU continue to support Kiev?

Видео

Ukraine need to stop declaring war on Russia and acting on behalf of Europe

more World news